On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 18:11:44 +0200, Hadron Quark wrote:
> Peter KÃhlmann <peter.koehlmann@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> Hadron Quark wrote:
>>
>>> B Gruff <bbgruff@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>>
>>>> On Tuesday 03 October 2006 15:06 Hadron Quark wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> There have been oodles of posters who have stated their dislike for
>>>>> Roy's spamming. There have been about 5 supporters of it : and I think
>>>>> we can guess who they all are. Hint you are one.
>>>>
>>>> Would you mind listing them all for us?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes. Would you list all those that support these posts?
>>>
>>
>> *That* should be an easy job for you. After all, you claim that only 5
>> suport it
>>
>> After that you could start compiling that list of those hundreds of posters
>> who "filtered the news posts because they flood the NG"
>>
>> Oh, BTW, you are a liar
>
> Just look at the replies to his spam News posts. It sums it all up
> really.
Not replying to posts gives zero indication of how many people actually
*read* them, or how many may have plonked them. There are over a thousand
subscribers to COLA, most of whom never post, so how can you possibly have
any idea how many people have kilfiled the News posts?
--
Kier
|
|
