-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 13:25:59 -0500,
Erik Funkenbusch <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 17:48:53 GMT, Sinister Midget wrote:
>
>> On 2006-10-17, Erik Funkenbusch <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> posted something concerning:
>>> On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 10:43:28 +0100, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>
>>>> US Military Testing IBM Speech Translation Technology
>>
>>>> http://www.linuxinsider.com/rsstory/53693.html
>>>
>>> "Rather than relying on a specific device, MASTOR was designed and
>>> optimized for multiple platforms and runs on Windows XP, Windows CE, Linux
>>> and Embedded Linux, IBM Research Manager for Speech Recognition and
>>> Understanding Yuqing Gao told TechNewsWorld."
>>>
>>> Even IBM refuses to commit to Linux, they keep hedging their bets.
>>
>> How is developing for linux, something they didn't used to do at all,
>> considered "hedging"?
>>
>> Are you saying because OO.org still develops for linux instead of
>> committing whole hog to Windows that they're still "hedging their
>> bets"?
>
> If they were committed to Linux, they'd be developing exclusively for
> Linux.
So it's your opinion that IBM Are not commited to MS-Windows?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFNZfQd90bcYOAWPYRAumpAJ0WW7vh1QsgMOKimE9p5cisE326hgCeNagb
QvRuW0pBos7p74GAuz/7M0k=
=ceMv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Jim Richardson http://www.eskimo.com/~warlock
If you can't laugh at yourself, someone else is going to do it for you,
and you're not going to enjoy it nearly as much.
|
|
