On 2006-10-17, Peter Köhlmann <peter.koehlmann@xxxxxxxxxxx> posted something concerning:
> Erik Funkenbusch wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 17:48:53 GMT, Sinister Midget wrote:
>>
>>> On 2006-10-17, Erik Funkenbusch <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> posted
>>> something concerning:
>>>> Even IBM refuses to commit to Linux, they keep hedging their bets.
>>>
>>> How is developing for linux, something they didn't used to do at all,
>>> considered "hedging"?
>>>
>>> Are you saying because OO.org still develops for linux instead of
>>> committing whole hog to Windows that they're still "hedging their
>>> bets"?
>>
>> If they were committed to Linux, they'd be developing exclusively for
>> Linux.
>
> More pure, unadultered idiocy from the FUDmeister
>
> Tell us, Erik, why is MS not committed to windows?
> After all, they develop also for Macs
>
> You are truly pathetic
As the saying goes: out of the mouths of boobs....
Erik is the quiessential boob.
--
"This update limits certain functionality in Outlook to provide a
higher level of security; it was not created to address a security
vulnerability within Outlook."
-Another innovative MS enhancement
|
|
