Peter K?hlmann <peter.koehlmann@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Erik Funkenbusch wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 17:48:53 GMT, Sinister Midget wrote:
>>
>>> On 2006-10-17, Erik Funkenbusch <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> posted
>>> something concerning:
>>>> On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 10:43:28 +0100, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> US Military Testing IBM Speech Translation Technology
>>>
>>>>> http://www.linuxinsider.com/rsstory/53693.html
>>>>
>>>> "Rather than relying on a specific device, MASTOR was designed and
>>>> optimized for multiple platforms and runs on Windows XP, Windows CE,
>>>> Linux and Embedded Linux, IBM Research Manager for Speech Recognition
>>>> and Understanding Yuqing Gao told TechNewsWorld."
>>>>
>>>> Even IBM refuses to commit to Linux, they keep hedging their bets.
>>>
>>> How is developing for linux, something they didn't used to do at all,
>>> considered "hedging"?
>>>
>>> Are you saying because OO.org still develops for linux instead of
>>> committing whole hog to Windows that they're still "hedging their
>>> bets"?
>>
>> If they were committed to Linux, they'd be developing exclusively for
>> Linux.
>
> More pure, unadultered idiocy from the FUDmeister
>
Pay no attention to him. He powercycles printers for a shitty college
that no one goes to.
-----yttrx
--
http://www.yttrx.net
|
|
