JEDIDIAH <jedi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On 2006-10-11, Hadron Quark <qadronhuark@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> JEDIDIAH <jedi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>> On 2006-10-11, Hadron Quark <qadronhuark@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> Jamie Hart <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> tjb wrote:
>>>>>> I wrote:
>>>>>>> I don't want to have to killfile all of your news posts, because I want to
>>>>>>> read *some* of them.
>>>>>> Just to add that he does post some really good ones. This is why
>>>>>> I'm so
>>>>>> hesitant on killfiling here. The problem is the sheer quantity of the
>>>>>> posts.
>>>>>
>>>>> Buy a clue. If he cuts down the volume, he may well cut out something
>>>>> you'd want to see.
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't killfile any of the news posts, just skim through them to see
>>>>> if there's anything I want to read, then I mark them all read and they
>>>>> magically disappear from view.
>>>>>
>>>>> Takes a couple of minutes at the most.
>>>>
>>>> But of course, if he posted a SINGLE journal we could mark that as
>>>> important and browse that one document at our own leisure and bring up
>>>> the articles from that. But of course Mark Kent has managed to fuck up
>>>
>>> You got a problem with using a web browser?
>>
>> No. Why? What has that got to do with it?
>
>>>> But of course, if he posted a SINGLE journal we could mark that as
>>>> important and browse that one document at our own leisure and bring up
>>>> the articles from that. But of course Mark Kent has managed to fuck up
>
> Why should he re-invent what has already been ready made for just
> this sort of situation (and associated cabal of whiners)?
Sorry? What *ARE* you talking about? You seem to have the thread
retention of a goldfish.
>
>>
>>>
>>> Searchable web based usenet archives have been around for years
>>> and years and years. They predate Google even.
>>
>> Err yes. I know. Which is how I find my news : I dont need Roy spamming
>> with hundreds of articles about Windows in a Linux advocacy NG.
>
> Ok. So you don't have a real newsreader.
>
No. I use gnus - heap of shit it is.......
>>
>>>
>>> The whiners are just technologically impaired. They can't even
>>> use their own Windows based GUI tools.
>>
>> What are you talking about? You seem to meander between non-connected
>> subjects.
>
> Usenet newsreaders have been able to filter out the sort of
> thing that you and the cabal of whiners are whining about since before
> there existed any version of Windows for there to be a GUI WinDOS
> newsreader for. You are all either incapable of using your own shiny
> happy tools, or those tools are incredibly lame.
Sorry? I have already said I filter them, but THAT IS NOT THE POINT.
Which makes a mockery of your dumbass claim that it floods out the
trolls .... it doesnt. It does, however, make a wasteland of the
archives.
I just hate redundancy of any information : and Roy is depriving sites
of their hitcount.
--
You are a vile asshole, flatfish. : Peter KÃhlmann, COLA.
|
|
