"chrisv" <chrisv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:gvj2h2d9v2uhikprkb0tl2u72a3c5kf30r@xxxxxxxxxx
Larry Qualig wrote:
Oliver Wong wrote:
So do you disagree that these features are interesting? Do you think
IPv6 or symbolic links are uninteresting? Do you ever use symbolic links
on
your machine? I suspect that you do. Even if you didn't know anything
about
Linux, just a basic install of Linux probably automatically creates
symbolic
links somewhere on your disk, right? So if nothing else, they are at
least
*useful*.
I find it amusing how some people dismiss these and other features in
Vista as worthless and uninteresting yet these very same people are the
ones who jump up-and-down in joy when XGL announces "Wobbly Menus."
(Note - There was an entire COLA topic on the benefits of "Wobbly
Menus" in XGL.)
Please provide evidence that the "same people" are doing what you
claim.
How about Roy? He's the one making the majority of the XGL posts, and he
seems to think XGL is cool (and I don't blame him, he is cool), and
simultaneously, he calls Vista "XP SP3" and otherwises dismisses Vista's
feature set as a "newer icon set".
- Oliver
|
|
