Hadron Quark wrote:
> mlw <mlw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> spike1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>
>>> JDS <jeffrey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> did eloquently scribble:
>>>> A couple of comlaints and poof he's gone. What's up?
>>>
>>> Nah, he won't listen to complaints
>>> specially not from the wintrolls. And mlw's complained a couple of times
>>> before. Not that it matters.
>>>
>>
>> What pisses me off, is, and anyone who has followed this group for a
>> while knows, I usually defend even the most annoying troll for freedom of
>> speech, but Roy S' "[news]" posts make finding new discussions difficult
>> unless you killfile all hist posts.
>>
>> I don't usually go negative first, but it is a ridiculous waste of
>> bandwidth.
>>
>> He has the freedom to do what he wants, but I also have the freedom to
>> think he is a fucking moron.
>
> I asked for a single digest : *some* of the articles are indeed of
> interest. But Mark'n'Roy "me too" Kent decided to post a digest *in
> addition* to the posts.
>
Isn't that nice? Now you've one additional source for those news
> So for the same reasons as you, I had to kill all Roy's original News
> posts.
>
More power to you
> For some reason thats hard to fathom, the hardcore Roy fanatics that
> actually think he is advocating with his unnecessary SPAM, seem sure
> that a digest is "impractical". I'm still to fathom why this might be.
>
Your mental deficiencies are not our problem
The linux advocates have in the vast majority said that they accept and like
those news posts
If you don't, killfile them. They are clearly marked. Problem solved
In reality though the trolls (and you are one of them) fear that their inane
posts get drowned. Can't have that, can we?
*That* is the reason we are hearing those shrill shrieks all the time
--
Warning: 10 days have passed since your last Windows reinstall.
|
|
