Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> __/ [ Larry Qualig ] on Friday 15 September 2006 22:51 \__
>
>>
>> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>> __/ [ Mark Kent ] on Friday 15 September 2006 18:11 \__
>>>
>>> > begin oe_protect.scr
>>> > BearItAll <spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>>> >> Mathew P. wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Thank you ladies and gentlemen. I look forward to awards
>>> >>> night.
>>> >>
>>> >> I thought I would start a fashion trend this year, I'll wear nothing
>>> >> other than a bit a of bling.
>>> >>
>>> >> I hope Hello mag wants an exclusive.
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> > It's Hello! magazine, not Hello :-) Or, you could try for OK!, or,
>>> > there's Closer!, or Heat!
>>>
>>>
>>> He could feature in page 3 of The Sun, but it'll probably take a lot of
>>> estrogen.
>>>
>>>
>>> > You'd've thought that the net might've put an end to such stuff, or
>>> > perhaps the proliferation of tv channels hosting magazine fluff aimed at
>>> > girlies, but no... if anything, there're more than ever!
>>> >
>>> > I wonder of billwg!!! writes for one?
>>>
>>>
>>> I think he's been gone for a while. And Larry nymshifted back to the old
>>> identity. Hadron Quark just wasn't to be...
>>
>>
>> I'm absolutely 100% positive that you're talking out of your ass on
>> this one. I have never posted as "Hadron Quark" and I'm most certain
>> that Hadron didn't break into my Google account and post as me.
>>
>> But hey, why let little inconveniences like the truth get in the way of
>> your far-fetched conspiracy theory. But then again, I'm sure that you
>> have some proof or evidence to support your claim. You do, don't you?
>
> I was being sarcastic. Sorry about that, Larry. Didn't mean to annoy you
> there, but rather make fun of "Hadron", whose /ad hominem/ attacks and bad
> language won't be missed. You, on the other hand, are polite and
Sorry? You really are a prissy little arse Roy. And not averse,
yourself, to posting some rather nasty comments when you get your
panties in a twist.
Those with out sin etc : and further more, I'd be interested in seeing
some links to "ad hominem" attacks. My "attacks" are only when I sport
barefaced lies being told by you and your sycophantic lackeys.
> well-mannered, putting aside the Roy Culley incident.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Roy
--
Your job is being a professor and researcher: That's one hell of a good excuse
for some of the brain-damages of minix.
-- Linus Torvalds to Andrew Tanenbaum
|
|
