On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 14:02:55 -0400
flatfish+++ <flatfish@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 17:44:54 +0000, ed wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 13:34:44 -0400
> > flatfish+++ <flatfish@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> Linux nutsacks love to pick on Internet Explorer for all kinds of
> >> reasons, most of them jealousy because they know that the vast
> >> majority of web sites are designed to work well with Internet
> >Explorer > because it is the # 1 browser.
> >
> > Two mistakes here, those sites are:
> >
> > 1. not designed
> > 2. do not work well
>
>
> It doesn't matter.
> Windows users can still view them.
>
> The Linux users time tested excuse is usually "Find another Bank etc"
Here in the UK the majority of councils are finding other companies to
do business with. When councils have any say in the matter they want to
ensure their demography can read the page on braile displays, which
means strict w3c compliance.
> > How can a site that is 'designed' work well when it renders only in
> > one browser, to me, and most designers, it is a contradiction.
>
>
> Because the designer chose to write for the 95+ percent of market.
>
> > If a site is designed then it will be compliant with standards.
>
> They don't care.
> IE gets them the vast majority of market.
The vast majority does not matter. The vast majority of the world also
has notepad on the desktop.
> >> So why are they squealing with joy when they can now run Internet
> >> Explorer under Linux (actually under Whino and Linux) ?
> >
> > We don't want to run a piece of shite to just see a webpage. No. Nuh
> > ah.
> >
> >> Total hypocrites these LIEnix fanatics are.
> >
> > Fuck off and think before you post such rants.
>
>
> Ahh, I knew it was coming.
>
> The truth hurts ray......
> Get over it, you'll live a lot longer and healthier life
I'm just sick and tired of your shit.
--
Regards, Ed :: http://www.s5h.net
just another unix person
Chuck Norris fought the law, and he won.
|
|
