yttrx wrote:
> DFS <nospam@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> flatfish+++ wrote:
>>> On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 10:12:12 -0400, DFS wrote:
>>>
>>>> Linonut wrote:
>>>>> After takin' a swig o' grog, Roy Schestowitz belched out this bit
>>>>> o' wisdom:
>>>>>
>>>>>> You can get Aero without the associated bloat.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://skins3.wincustomize.com/Frogboy/screenshots/10977.jpg
>>>>>
>>>>> Isn't Stardock itself bloat?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Very much so, at least the last time I tried it. Unstable, buggy,
>>>> bloated (though some of the themes are great).
>>>
>>> Agreed.
>>> It's terrible IMHO.
>>> The Symantec of the gui/interface/eyecandy world.
>>
>> Which is why a moron like yttrx swears by it...
>>
>
> Sweetie, I'm the one who understands computers, doesn't whine about
> his problems, and figures out how to solve issues as they come up on
> his own, remember?
>
> You're the moron. <3
>
> Also, I didn't swear by it. You lied--so you're a liar and an idiot.
You didn't, eh? So you didn't say this on cola:
"I have some experience with Stardock, and can vouch for its integrity.
Those guys put out some very, very good and handy software."
> I just use it because I cant fucking stand the way windows of any kind
> looks on its own. Its merely personal preference.
|
|
