flatfish+++ <flatfish@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 10:12:12 -0400, DFS wrote:
>
>> Linonut wrote:
>>> After takin' a swig o' grog, Roy Schestowitz belched out this bit o'
>>> wisdom:
>>>
>>>> You can get Aero without the associated bloat.
>>>>
>>>> http://skins3.wincustomize.com/Frogboy/screenshots/10977.jpg
>>>
>>> Isn't Stardock itself bloat?
>>
>>
>> Very much so, at least the last time I tried it. Unstable, buggy, bloated
>> (though some of the themes are great).
>
> Agreed.
> It's terrible IMHO.
> The Symantec of the gui/interface/eyecandy world.
>
Huh, works just fine for me, and completely stable. I've been using it for
about three years.
-----yttrx
--
http://www.yttrx.net
|
|
