On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 19:41:39 +0200, Hadron Quark wrote:
> flatfish+++ <flatfish@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 16:47:35 +0200, Hadron Quark wrote:
>>
>>> "Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz" <spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>>
>>>> begin In <1159437330.28833.0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, on 09/28/2006
>>>> at 10:55 AM, Jamie Hart <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
>>>>
>>>>>Well then, there's the problem right there. you came to an advocacy
>>>>>group for advice.
>>>>
>>>> Actually, you can get good advise in an advocacy group, but it's
>>>> easier if you don't have a chip on your shoulder and if you don't ask
>>>> vague, ill formed questions. I'm willing to help the OP if she/he/it
>>>> loses that chip, otherwise mwatters_newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxx goes into
>>>> my twit list. I'm half tempted to just add @gmail.com and
>>>> @hotmail.com, since both seem to be sewers.
>>>
>>> Holey moley you're an arrogant prick. "gmail" is a sewer??? Grow up or get a
>>> life or maybe even both you elitist dickhead.
>>
>>
>> Actually he looks more like a paranoid nutter.
>> Take a look at his sig!
>>
>
> I'd assumed that was a joke signature!
In COLA?
Linux zealots are humorless, except to observe and only then from a
distance and up wind of course.
The majority of them are dull with a capital D.
Look at Mark Kent, Roy Schestowich and God help us William Poaster.
It doesn't get any more boring than that.
|
|
