begin oe_protect.scr
Linonut <linonut@xxxxxxxx> espoused:
> After takin' a swig o' grog, Erik Funkenbusch belched out this bit o' wisdom:
>
>> On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 04:40:26 GMT, yttrx wrote:
>>
>>> Erik Funkenbusch <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:47:16 +0100, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> http://tinyurl.com/gbbfq
>>>>
>>>> There you go breaking copyright laws again.
>>>>
>>>> I especially like the part at the bottom where you fraudulently claim
>>>> Microsoft has copyrighted your work.
>>>>
>>>> Parody protection does not extend to fraud, nor does it allow you to copy
>>>> images (such as logo's) that are copyrighted works without permission.
>>>
>>> Man, if I were Roy, you'd be in court so fast (and losing every shirt
>>> you have) you wouldn't even have time to post about it.
>>
>> He can't take me to court when it's true, which it is. This isn't the
>> first time he's violated copyright law. The last time, the author spent
>> weeks trying to get him to remove a copyrighted work from his site.
>> Eventually, he took it down... i'd assume because his ISP was about to
>> terminate his connectivity.
>
> So why are you linking to it?
>
I'd say that he's perhaps trying to intimidate Roy. If so, that would
be illegal in itself.
--
| Mark Kent -- mark at ellandroad dot demon dot co dot uk |
To be considered successful, a woman must be much better at her job
than a man would have to be. Fortunately, this isn't difficult.
|
|
