On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 20:59:31 -0700, Tim Smith wrote:
> In article <mdeku3-p43.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
> Jim Richardson <warlock@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> So, having read the post, do you support FF's mangling of the URL and
>> then attributing the words to another?
>
> Editing things marked as quoted (other than standard edits, like
> replacing things with [...] and marking things with (sic)) is always
> wrong. He should not have done that.
>
> Mangling the URL in the quotes is wrong. He should not have done that.
>
> If the URL had not been quoted, so the mangling was just to prevent
> people from going to the references site, rather than to make it look
> like someone else mangled it, then I think it is annoying, whether he
> does it, or whether Roy S does it.
I generally don't do it, I was only trying to prove a point and give
Roiboi a little of his own medicine.
IOW subject lines that have nothing to do with the body of the message.
|
|
