Erik Funkenbusch wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 23:03:04 +0200, Roy Culley wrote:
>
>> begin risky.vbs
>> <1l4hzghumwnky.dlg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>> Erik Funkenbusch <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>> On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 10:50:05 +0100, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>
>>>> There appear to be disinformation going about, initiated by Microsoft
>>>> shills. But the GPL has won in court, /again/. it's factual.
>>>>
>>>> http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/09/23/1655248
>>>>
>>>> GPL Successfully Defended in German Court
>>>
>>> Wrong again.
>>>
>>> Please show me the actual text of the judgement that states the GPL is
>>> valid. Don't go quoting anywhere else, the judgement itself is the only
>>> source of whether your claim is true or not.
>>>
>>> What? Can't do it?
>>>
>>> Sorry, Charlie. You're full of it again.
>>
>> You have gone very quiet Erik. Is that because you spoke out of your
>> arse spreading FUD as usual? Speak up Erik. Have the guts to admit
>> that you were clueless when making your reply and did so only because
>> of MS's^H^H^^H^Hyour hatred of the GPL.
>
> What are you talking about? Nobody has yet shown the actual text of the
> judgement that upholds the GPL. You guys are the quiet ones.
http://www.jbb.de/urteil_lg_frankfurt_gpl.pdf
That link was posted several times, Erik
Read it. It will show you are full of it
--
Microsoft: which revised Eula do you want to accept today?
|
|
