Roy Schestowitz wrote:
> http://tinyurl.com/p8uh7
Virus and other Malware protection should be purely subscription (i.e.
service) based anyway. Those that claim to be free (not Free) are little
more than a tease, and likely to lead to a false sense of security.
I'd be happy to use FOSS Malware protection in combination with a paid
subscription, but currently NOD32 + Outpost (both commercial) are better
solutions (for Windows) IMHO.
ClamAV is fine as a mail scanner (has little use protecting Linux
itself, since there's almost no need), but I'm not sure how its database
stands up against commercial offerings.
Are there stats for ClamAV/Win on Virus Bulletin?
--
K.
http://slated.org - Slated, Rated & Blogged
.----
| California's Great; it's such a lovely state,
| And every lawn is sitting on a contintinental plate.
`----
- Animaniacs ( http://youtube.com/watch?v=XKcgTnfoM9Q )
Fedora Core release 5 (Bordeaux) on sky, running kernel 2.6.16-1.2133_FC5
19:06:05 up 98 days, 19:22, 3 users, load average: 0.00, 0.03, 0.00
|
|
