begin risky.vbs
<1l4hzghumwnky.dlg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Erik Funkenbusch <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 10:50:05 +0100, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>
>> There appear to be disinformation going about, initiated by Microsoft shills.
>> But the GPL has won in court, /again/. it's factual.
>>
>> http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/09/23/1655248
>>
>> GPL Successfully Defended in German Court
>
> Wrong again.
>
> Please show me the actual text of the judgement that states the GPL
> is valid. Don't go quoting anywhere else, the judgement itself is
> the only source of whether your claim is true or not.
My daughter just read it for me:
http://www.jbb.de/urteil_lg_frankfurt_gpl.pdf
She says the case was lost because DLink had violated the GPL. She
said it was quite clear and specific.
> What? Can't do it?
>
> Sorry, Charlie. You're full of it again.
You were saying? Poor Erik, a prat as usual
--
"Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as
false, and by rulers as useful." -- Seneca the Younger (4? BC - 65 AD)
|
|
