"ness...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" wrote:
> Doug Mentohl wrote:
>> amicus_curious wrote:
>>
>>> Jones is a paid Linux shill, pure and simple
>>
>> Ok, until you prove otherwise we can assume that you are
>> are paid up MS astroturfer, same as ewic who's been
>> hanging round a group he professes to despise since 1996
>> ..
>
> Precisely my conclusion. Amazing how these talking points
> suddenly pop up in identical form by all the trolls, all at the
> same time. It doesn't matter how ridiculous they are on the
> face of them. Isn't that the theory of the big lie? Say it
> often enough, it doesn't matter if it hangs together, and
> people will believe it?
True, it is one of the oldest techniques to used discredit someone.
It is also amazing how that rather than conduct decent discussion with
reasonable counter arguments, that the classic trolls in
c.o.l.advocacy in reference to Mr. Schestowitz, Mr. Kent and a few
others, will utter gross, defamating styled, repulsive names, with
their selective snippage of facts.
It is fortunate that personas such as PJ and Mr. Langford with his
"Boycott Iomega" website have exposed the truth with these predatory
type companies. The best way to refute is to expose the facts.
As initially started in this thread, the actions of SCO in subpoenaing
Groklaw does seem to show indeed that SCO's legal team is now grasping
for straws.
Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation or SLAPP type lawsuits
against bloggers is nothing new. Thomas Paine blogged with his
"Common Sense" and Martin Luther with his "The 95 Theses". These
writings made changes to current thinking in the world at the time.
Similarly, blogs such as Groklaw and Boycott Iomega are helping to
change thinking in the world at this time.
--
HPT
|
|
