Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: [Roy Schestowitz Lies Again] Company Dumps .NET Software, Finds Happiness in Open Source

  • Subject: Re: [Roy Schestowitz Lies Again] Company Dumps .NET Software, Finds Happiness in Open Source
  • From: "[H]omer" <spam@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2007 04:39:13 +0100
  • In-reply-to: <7padnQnc3-2wo4XbnZ2dnUVZ_oOknZ2d@bresnan.com>
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: Slated.org
  • References: <2911485.1qYC6HAcsN@schestowitz.com> <qbrbkohy1yv4$.dlg@funkenbusch.com> <7padnQnc3-2wo4XbnZ2dnUVZ_oOknZ2d@bresnan.com>
  • User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.8.0.10) Gecko/20070302 Fedora/1.5.0.10-1.fc6 pango-text Thunderbird/1.5.0.10 Mnenhy/0.7.4.666
  • Xref: ellandroad.demon.co.uk comp.os.linux.advocacy:512485
Verily I say unto thee, that Maverick spake thusly:
> Erik Funkenbusch wrote:
>> On Sat, 07 Apr 2007 15:25:38 +0100, Roy Schestowitz wrote:

>>> Open source SplendidCRM a sweet alternative for ".Net-centric"
>>> SAAS provider
[...]
>>> http://www.itmanagersjournal.com/feature/22363

>> You are such a fucking liar, Roy.  Jesus.
>> 
>> The entire article is about how the PHP based SugarCRM wouldn't
>> work for them, so instead they went with a SplendidCRM which *IS* a
>> .NET based product.

> According to the title it isn't.

It could be interpreted either way, as either "[an] alternative for [a]
".Net-centric" [product]" or "[an] alternative [(but still .Net based)]
[product] for [a] ".Net-centric" *provider*"

> If it is as you say it is, then the article misled, not Roy.
> According to the article title, which isn't Roys, it claims that
> SplendidCRM is open source.  But of course deeper into the article it
> is ".NET-centric".  It doesn't say it is developed with ".NET"...
> just that it is oriented towards the MS platform.

According to the SplendidCRM website, it is indeed developed on .Net.

"SplendidCRM was written in C# using the Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0
and Microsoft SQL Server 2000."

 - http://tinyurl.com/yqqmnz (splendidcrm.com)

Although Roy clearly missed the context, the sentiment is still correct,
that here is a company that could not find a viable solution using
proprietary software, and needed to turn to FOSS for the answer.

On the front page:

'SplendidCRM Software, Inc. has released SplendidCRM Professional 1.3
and SplendidCRM Open-Source 1.3, Customer Relationship Management (CRM)
applications licensed in part under the "SugarCRM Public License 1.1.3".'

This license is a modified version of the Mozilla Public License Version
1.1:

http://www.sugarcrm.com/crm/SPL

As for Roy's further comments (or rather observations) on .NET, I agree
completely - it's the bloated bastard (kidnapped) son of Java, and
should have been killed at birth.

-- 
K.
http://slated.org

.----
| I found [Vista] to be a dangerously unstable operating system,
| which has caused me to lose data ... unfortunately this product
| is unfit for any user. - [H]ardOCP, <http://tinyurl.com/3bpfs2>
`----

Fedora Core release 5 (Bordeaux) on sky, running kernel 2.6.20-1.2307.fc5
 04:13:31 up  2:05,  2 users,  load average: 0.08, 0.06, 0.09

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index