On Apr 16, 11:30 am, Maverick <S...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Tim Smith wrote:
> > In article <pN6dnW-zLs3c_r_bnZ2dnUVZ_orin...@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
> > Maverick <S...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >>>They did not dump .NET software. In fact, they evaluated non-.NET
> >>>software, and decided to go with .NET software. This is the *opposite*
> >>>of what Roy's headline claims.
>
> >>They used "OPEN SOURCE"!!!!!
>
> > Yes, open source .NET software. Hence, they did not dump .NET.
>
> .NET is a M$ registered trademark... isn't it?
>
> But I see the final point and can easily be a confusing point.
>
Yes, to you. You don't seem to be able to parse the fact that
SplendidCRM is .NET CRM. There are 2 versions, one oss and the other
commercial. It is written using C# - and though, I have no direct
evidence, most likely using VS2005.
> No, they didn't dump the .NET software, but converted to an Open Source
> approach to a .NET-centric version.
>
> So it is all a matter of viewpoint isn't it.
>
> They dumped anything used by MS tools to make .NET software and used an
> open source methodology instead. By using this approach they eliminated
> the M$ tax. And that is really the jist of the whole thing.
NO. Dude, the whole thing is built on an MS stack - check out their
website. SQLServer, C#, ASP.NET, etc. In fact, if you want the sql
source, you have to use the paid version :)
--
Tom Shelton
|
|