flyer wrote:
>hadronquark@xxxxxxxxx says...
>>
>> b) Your reply was nonsensical in every respect.
>
>You omit even a single tiny example of nonsensicality on my part, and
>instead attempt, using a broad sweeping negative generality, to say
>something where there is nothing valid to be said.
>
>I guess you're lying out the front of your face.
Nothing new for the Quack asshole.
|
|
