On Sat, 14 Apr 2007 02:26:50 +0100, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
> __/ [ Larry Qualig ] on Saturday 14 April 2007 01:25 \__
>
>> Do show EXACTLY where it says that Cisco hardware offers "No Security"
>> as your subject line (lie) says???
>>
>> Oh that's right. It doesn't. Because you Roy Schestowitz are a dishonest
>> liar.
>
> Is this the shills' new thing? Modifying subject line to attach
> stereotypes and adding my name to get past the killfiles?
Except "Message-ID Larry" didn't get past mine...
> Read the first item.
>
> "These flaws [in Cisco routers] could be exploited to disrupt networking
> services, gain access to information, or even take control of an access
> point, Cisco said."
>
> So who is the liar? Me, or the one who decided to call me a liar while
> Cisco acknowledges that its routers can be potentially hijacked?
Why, "Message-ID Larry" of course! Cisco have had problems with their
routers since 2005, & possibly before that. I understand that buffer
overflow attacks can be carried out in several ways on Cisco IOS routers.
> Take a chill pill. Please.
Instead of smoking the shit he's on....
--
This message was not created on a
Windows PC, & NO M$ products were used.
The letters "F" & "U" & the word "Micro$oft"
were brought to you by Linux.
|
|
