On Apr 13, 9:26 pm, Roy Schestowitz <newsgro...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> __/ [ Larry Qualig ] on Saturday 14 April 2007 01:25 \__
>
> > Do show EXACTLY where it says that Cisco hardware offers "No Security"
> > as your subject line (lie) says???
>
> > Oh that's right. It doesn't. Because you Roy Schestowitz are a
> > dishonest liar.
>
> Is this the shills' new thing? Modifying subject line to attach stereotypes
> and adding my name to get past the killfiles?
I couldn't care less about your childish killfiles. Start an off-line
exchange with Willy 'empty suit' Poaster if that's your primary
interest.
> Read the first item.
I did. It's about a vulnerability in a Cisco router. News for you...
OSS software also has vulnerabilies and is no perfect. But NOWHERE
does the article say what you claim - that Cisco offers "NO SECURITY."
That's simply a lie.
> "These flaws [in Cisco routers] could be exploited to disrupt networking
> services, gain access to information, or even take control of an access
> point, Cisco said."
Yes, it has a flaw. But a flaw is not the same as "no security."
> So who is the liar?
You are .
> Me, or the one who decided to call me a liar while Cisco
> acknowledges that its routers can be potentially hijacked?
Potentially hijacked != NO SECURITY. You are a liar.
> Take a chill
> pill. Please.
Quit posting for 10 minutes and take a nap. Your thinking will clear
up.
|
|
