Mike wrote:
> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>> __/ [ Doug Mentohl ] on Saturday 21 April 2007 17:33 \__
>>
>>> REDACTED
>>>
>>> ..
>>>
>>> REDACTED
>>>
>>> ..
>>>
>>> From: jimgr Mon Jan 16 14:30:16 1989
>>> To: markwa; russw
>>> Subject: Re: Breakdown of new api calls
>>> Date: Thu Nov 07 15:18:11 PDT 1991
>>>
>>> It turns out I inadvertantly left off two categories from my list:
>>>
>>> String functions (lstrcat, IsCharUpper, etc.)
>>> File i/o functions (_lclose, etc)
>>>
>>> This brings the total to 59.
>>>
>>> Please note that when I use the term "new APIs." I am also referring
>>> to previously "hidden" functions which will now be documentated.
>>> They are new insofar as they will be added to the documenation
>>> although they already exist.
>>>
>>> > From russw Mon Jan 16 13:38:12 1989
>>> To: markwa
>>> Subject: Breakdown of new api calls
>>> Cc: jimgr
>>> Date: Mon Jan 16 13:36:27 1989
>>>
>>> I count them up and get 42 not 60
>>>
>>> ..
>>>
>>> REDACTED
>>>
>>> ..
>>>
>>> http://edge-op.org/iowa/www.iowaconsumercase.org/011607/4000/PX04600.pdf
>>
>> The following is far more criminal.
>>
>> 'A number of Microsoft ex-employees and certified developers have
>> referred to much of Microsoft's formal documentation as
>> "undocumentation"'
>>
>>
http://www.sonic.net/~undoc/comes_v_microsoft/Supp_Rpt_Andrew_Schulman.pdf
>
> Relation to Linux?
>
Simple. Several of your fellow dimwits steadfastly deny any such doing by MS
and instead try to slag linux, here in cola
--
Who the fuck is General Failure, and why is he reading my harddisk?
|
|
