Peter Köhlmann wrote:
William Poaster wrote:
As a matter of interest, has the Hardon Quack troll said
anything about Scott Douglas libelling Roy Schestowitz?
Yes. He finds nothing wrong with it
Or is he, as usual, siding with the other trolls.....
He is. Nothing new
But then, Hadron Quark himself is scum of the worst sort
I thought you expressed it best in post:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/
64ac7146198d17d3
or http://tinyurl.com/2n5exq
[quote]
Do you think? Flatfish is definitely an advocate.
Certainly. And to emphasize his "advocacy", he nymshifted to
Don't be so childish & ridiculous.
Well, what can I say? After all, you Hadron, "true linux
advocate" and "kernel hacker" call flatfish (of all people) an
"advocate". Flatfish is a liar, he nymshifts like mad, he is a
sick troll, he is a software thief and he is also a vile racist.
Yup, definitely an "advocate". Just not a "linux advocate". But
then, so aren't you.
[/quote]
Oh, and lest we forget that Hadron is a nymshifter:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/7e0d5331305...
or http://tinyurl.com/2uqruj
From: Peter Kai Jensen <use...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Another failed Linux migration
Date: 25 Jan 2007 13:58:44 GMT
[quote]
Well, it's just his behavior, timing, and posting style. Hadron
announces that he is leaving sometime over the holidays. A few
days later, Hans Schneider shows up and despite having no posting
history anywhere else on Usenet, seems very accustomed to COLA.
Suspicious, yes, hard proof, no. But then came the bitching
about Andrew Halliwell's signature, which I have never heard any
troll raise a word about until Hadron did it shortly before
leaving. This happens on Jan 8, and at around this time
suspicions of his true identity are raised by several posters.
The day after, Damian O'Leary shows up, again with no history
outside COLA, and behaves very similarly. Hans Schneider then
drops off Usenet completely some 5 days later.
[/quote]
--
HPT
|
|
