____/ waterskidoo on Saturday 18 August 2007 17:45 : \____
> On 2007-08-18, AZ Nomad <aznomad.2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Sat, 18 Aug 2007 15:21:08 +0000 (UTC), waterskidoo
>> <water.skidoo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On 2007-08-18, Rick <none@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 18 Aug 2007 04:46:49 +0100, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> [via /.]
>>>>>
>>>>> http://whyfirefoxisblocked.com/
>>>>>
>>>> Whoever owns/wrote this page has serious issues. And you can find out the
>>>> owner easily through whois.
>>>>
>>>> I guess this person figures he/she doesn't need the business of people
>>>> that can evaluate products and decide for themselves what they want.
>>
>>>It doesn't seem much different than some of the more radical Linux
>>>zealot rantings.
>> Except the absolute lack of anything in common.
>>
>>>The principle is the same. So what makes him wrong and others
>>>that may support *your* pov right?
>>>Just curious.
>> linux is about choice. Your projecting doesn't change that.
>
> See b0ycottn0vel.c0m for example.
> It's the principle, not the exact details of why.
Novell violated a licence (in spirit). Is that right in /anyone's/ point of
view? Novell chose money over people. Is that human?
--
~~ Best of wishes
Roy S. Schestowitz | Open minds, open source
http://Schestowitz.com | GNU is Not UNIX | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
http://iuron.com - proposing a non-profit search engine
|
|
