flatfish@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On Aug 26, 4:52 pm, Roy Schestowitz <newsgro...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>> waterskidoo was all along flatfish
>>
>> -Replying to self with crossposting
>> -Knowledge or prior posts (going months back)
>> -Familiarity with people who no longer post here
>> -Writing style (paragraphs and newlines)
>> -Child using XBox360
>> -Female identity
>> -Disappearing for several days after persistent posting, which
>> incidentally is the same time when vile behaviour from flashfish nyms
>> returns
>>
>> Flatfish had many people fooled, but it was several days ago that some of
>> us realised that waterskidoo is probably flatfish.
>>
>> That last post confirms it. No more evidence could probably be needed. No
>> need to even join more dots.
>
> God is this funny. I've been waiting for you fools to accuse
> WaterSkidoo of being flatfish and it sure didn't take long. I guess
> you didn't expect me to come to the surface but guess what? Just like
> you and your butt buddies prefer offline contact to plan your attacks,
> people email me as well when my name comes to the surface. For wat it
> is worth, once again, you make wild ass accusations with zero proof.
>
> Why not attack the posts?
> Why?
> Because you can't. WaterSkidoo even supported you Roy, but I guess
> your loyalty runs with the likes of the other nutsacks in COLA. Mark
> Kent, Homer, Linonut, High Plains, 7 and others.
> So be it, but I challenge ANYONE to look at WaterSkiDoo's posts and
> label him a troll.
Troll!!!
> Can't be done, except in COLA where the nutsacks rule.
> Thanks for showing your true colors for all to see.
>
> Oh yea, make usre and check the ip address, headers and email me if
> you wish because unlike you phonies I have a real email address and am
> not hiding anything.
Trollllll!!!!!!!!
Now let me get this right....
Deeeepppphhh Breathhhhhh....
Right!
<snif!>
You are now trolling to get one of your socks off the hook for trolling?
|
|
