After takin' a swig o' grog, yttrx belched out this bit o' wisdom:
> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Oracle 11g ships first on Linux, not Microsoft Windows
>
> No DBA worth their weight in poodle shit would run Oracle on Windows unless
> they were threatened with firing by a retarded manager with styrofoam for
> brains. Why? Not because microsoft is evil or windows is crap---but in this
> case, because the Unices (and linux, recently) allow for very fine tuning of
> things like semaphores and shared memory.
A decade ago, I watch a couple guys floundering with Oracle development
on Windows. I don't know for sure if was that combination, or their
incompetence/inexperience, but it sure made our client go with SQL Server.
> And, it runs better on Unix than it does on Linux anyhow.
Again, would that be Linux's fault, or the Oracle guys' fault?
--
Oracle says: "Situation is fuzzy."
|
|
