On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 04:35:36 +0000, Roy Schestowitz
<newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>____/ 7 on Monday 10 December 2007 00:14 : \____
>
>> micoshaft asstroturfer flatfish wrote on behalf of micoshaft corporation:
>>
>>> On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 23:35:08 +0000, Roy Schestowitz
>>> <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Free software from networks of programmers
>>>>
>>>>,----[ Quote ]
>>>>| Find ways to do tasks without charge by means of 'open source'
>>>>| technology
>>>>`----
>>>>
>>>>http://www.azstarnet.com/allheadlines/215073
>>>>
>>>>Linux Sequencer Updated
>>>
>>> These things are a total waste for the professional musician.
>>
>> But not a waste of time for the average college kid trying
>> to become a musician free of charge.
>>
>>> Lack of support for the top firewire and control surfaces is just the
>>> start.
>>>
>>> Rosegarden is like Windows sequencers circa 1985, only not as good.
>>> Audacity is decent.
>>> Ardour isn't bad.
>>> But again it's all about the plugins and interface support and that's
>>> where Linux dies.
>>> Streaming audio to disk is trivial.
>>> Making plugins like Ivory, Bias, Waves, EastWest, UAD is not and that
>>> is where Linux dies.
>>
>> Your reviews materially suck as you don't know what professional
>> musicians use Linux for.
>>
>> You have never used dynebolic I can see and the hundred or so
>> free music utilities that come with it.
>> You know people have been making podcasts
>> for years with that free of charge. They are just the part
>> of 1 million new Linux users per month switching to Linux and
>> the rate is increasing.
>>
>> http://www.livecdlist.com
>> http://www.distrowatch.com
>
>A lot of professional (top-notch) audio equipment is Linux-based. I posted one
>example yesterday. Hollywood uses GNU/Linux for film production as well.
>
>Ignore the troll.
No Ignore the idiot, you Roy Schestowitz.
Please stick to boring podcasts and leave professional audio to
others.
You know nothing.
|
|
