Verily I say unto thee, that High Plains Thumper spake thusly:
> After looking at companies that opted for a Unix/Linux environment,
> I'd say that one was better off going with NFS than CIFS/SMB. Then
> Microsoft interoperability is not an issue.
And neither is the mystery of disappearing Windows network shares.
I just don't have any time for SMB at all, it is without question the
most unreliable networking protocol I have ever used, and now (thanks to
the wonders of SMB2 on Vista) one of the slowest too. Bleh, Microsoft.
--
K.
http://slated.org
.----
| "Future archaeologists will be able to identify a 'Vista Upgrade
| Layer' when they go through our landfill sites." - Siân Berry,
| Green Party. http://www.greenparty.org.uk/news/2851
`----
Fedora release 7 (Moonshine) on sky, running kernel 2.6.22.9-91.fc7
09:10:12 up 4:56, 1 user, load average: 0.18, 0.15, 0.18
|
|
