[snips]
On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 19:41:38 +0000, [H]omer wrote:
> Oh and one final question: how does one advocate Microsoft Windows,
> when there really isn't anything about it worth advocating?
One could adopt the same mechanism apparently used by some rags when
reporting critics' reviews. To wit:
"Your work is both good and original..." [1]
"From the moment I picked up your book until I laid it down I was
convulsed with laughter..." [2]
"This is not a novel to be tossed aside lightly." [3]
So, we apply the same concept to Windows advocacy and we come up with such
jewels as:
"Having recently been using a competing OS, I really miss Windows." [4]
"Vista is a definite improvement over XP." [5]
"I really enjoy working with Vista." [6]
Voila. Instant advocacy. :)
[1] "Your work is both good and original, but the parts which are good are
not original and the parts which are original are not good."
[2] "From the moment I picked up your book until I laid it down I was
convulsed with laughter. Someday I intend reading it."
[3] "This is not a novel to be tossed aside lightly. It should be thrown
with great force."
[4] In about the same way I miss the intestinal flu.
[5] Just as amoebic dysentery is an improvement over death.
[6] Almost as much as I enjoy having my teeth drilled without novocaine.
|
|
