Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: DFS responses; not technical; watered down

  • Subject: Re: DFS responses; not technical; watered down
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 16:17:01 +0000
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: schestowitz.com / Netscape
  • References: <TbGdnRcZKIvQeH7YnZ2dnUVZ_rLinZ2d@speakeasy.net> <slrneu8kd5.a4m.jason@jason.websterscafe.com>
  • Reply-to: newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • User-agent: KNode/0.7.2
__/ [ Handover Phist ] on Tuesday 27 February 2007 15:48 \__

> John said "DFS responses; not technical; watered down"
>>         
>> DFS has really declined in quality.
>>
>> Here is a sampling of some of his recent reponses...note the complete lack
>> of technical information:
>>
>>
>>>>>
>> What mess?
>>
>> Sure you do, Windows developer.
>>
>> Someone paid, that's for sure.
>>
>> For better or worse, yes, yes it is.
>>
>> Sounds positively psychedelic.  But the future probably isn't so flowery
>> as you describe.
>>
>> It runs fine on my 1gb RAM system, though I haven't done any serious
>> testing.
>>
>><<<
> 
> I can't remember how long ago I plonked DFS.

For me it was as soon as I entered. The nerve of coming to Linux advocacy
forum and then posting new threads which are all inflammatory and
anti-charter (it's what got tab kicked out)... it's like entering a shrine
and then pissing all over the place.  Give this man a bucket, or toss him in
one (plonk).

-- 
                ~~ Best wishes 

http://youtube.com/watch?v=bYsxaMyFV2Y http://youtube.com/watch?v=QNb7gPA1JFk
http://Schestowitz.com  |     GNU/Linux     |     PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Swap:  1036184k total,   501864k used,   534320k free,    59160k cached
      http://iuron.com - next generation of search paradigms

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index