__/ [ Handover Phist ] on Tuesday 27 February 2007 15:48 \__
> John said "DFS responses; not technical; watered down"
>>
>> DFS has really declined in quality.
>>
>> Here is a sampling of some of his recent reponses...note the complete lack
>> of technical information:
>>
>>
>>>>>
>> What mess?
>>
>> Sure you do, Windows developer.
>>
>> Someone paid, that's for sure.
>>
>> For better or worse, yes, yes it is.
>>
>> Sounds positively psychedelic. But the future probably isn't so flowery
>> as you describe.
>>
>> It runs fine on my 1gb RAM system, though I haven't done any serious
>> testing.
>>
>><<<
>
> I can't remember how long ago I plonked DFS.
For me it was as soon as I entered. The nerve of coming to Linux advocacy
forum and then posting new threads which are all inflammatory and
anti-charter (it's what got tab kicked out)... it's like entering a shrine
and then pissing all over the place. Give this man a bucket, or toss him in
one (plonk).
--
~~ Best wishes
http://youtube.com/watch?v=bYsxaMyFV2Y http://youtube.com/watch?v=QNb7gPA1JFk
http://Schestowitz.com | GNU/Linux | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Swap: 1036184k total, 501864k used, 534320k free, 59160k cached
http://iuron.com - next generation of search paradigms
|
|
