Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: [News] Critical Internet Explorer Flaw Returns to Life, Affects IE7

__/ [ AB ] on Friday 23 February 2007 11:38 \__

> On 2007-02-23, Erik Funkenbusch <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> claimed:
>> On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 05:04:32 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>
>>> Critical IE Graphics Flaw Resurfaces
>>> 
>>> ,----[ Quote ]
>>>| It's bad enough when crooks exploit bugs to ruin a home computer,
>>>| but the consequences of a successful attack can be much worse.
>>>| A substitute teacher in Norwich, Connecticut, found that out when
>>>| a computer she was using in her classroom suddenly started showing
>>>| pornographic pop-up ads to everyone in the class. She now faces up
>>>| to 40 years in prison after being convicted of willfully showing
>>>| her students the images. A security expert hired by her defense,
>>>| however, says he found malicious software on the PC.
>>> `----
>>> 
>>> http://news.yahoo.com/s/pcworld/128385;_ylt=AnYSp3TwbF_W2YFkgjhv9oEDW7oF
>>> 
>>> Most secure Web browser ever, eh?
>>
>> "Both IE 6 and 7 are affected, but IE 7 in Windows Vista is not."
>>
>> Funny how you keep forgetting that bit...
> 
> Sorry if I'm misinterpreting what you're saying. So feel free to
> correct me, m'kay?
> 
> You say it takes Vista *and* IE 7 to prevent this. Not only is IE 7
> *not* on Vista affected by this, but also IE 6 on anything (at least,
> that's what you're implying).
> 
> But I thought MS claimed IE 7 alone was more secure than previous
> versions.
> 
> http://www.microsoft.com/windows/products/winfamily/ie/features.mspx
> 
>    Dynamic Security Protection
> 
>    Internet Explorer 7 provides security through a robust new
>    architecture, security features that help defend against malicious
>    software (also known as malware), and new ways to better protect
>    against the theft of personal data from fraudulent websites, a
>    practice known as phishing. Click on the features to learn more.
> 
> No mention of Vista there.
> 
> How about here:
> 
> http://www.microsoft.com/windows/products/winfamily/ie/ev/default.mspx
> 
> Nope. No Vista on that page. Except as a link to something unrelated.
> 
> Could you square this with your buddies at Redmond and get back to us
> with the correct spin?

Windows Vista is still not a stable release (let alone a secure one). Come
back when it's ready for production PCs. Maybe SP2, some time in 2008.

-- 
                ~~ Best wishes 

Roy S. Schestowitz      | How I learned to stop worrying and love GNU/Linux
http://Schestowitz.com  |    RHAT Linux     |     PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
  1:20pm  up 31 days 13:38,  8 users,  load average: 1.12, 1.19, 1.16
      http://iuron.com - Open Source knowledge engine project

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index