Vista: fit for purpose...
,----[ Quote ]
| No, software should have at least a limited "fitness for purpose?"
| warranty. It costs enough (even Freeware costs money to provision,
| support and de-provision) and it is critical to many businesses.
| Mind you, such a limited warranty would be hard to formulate in practice
| - but without it there's the suspicion that software companies are
| really admitting that they can't write code they can be confident in.
`----
http://www.regdeveloper.co.uk/2007/01/29/fit_for_purpose/
Upgrading to Vista? Don't delete XP
,----[ Quote ]
| The latest concern is the requirement that users installing an
| upgrade version of Microsoft's new operating system have an
| older version of Windows working on their computer.
`----
http://news.com.com/2061-11199_3-6154138.html?part=rss&tag=2547-1_3-0-20&subj=news
Related:
Microsoft admits Vista screwed - report
,----[ Quote ]
| Vista SP1 is code named "Fiji", presumably after a pretty looking
| island which is paralysed by coups.
|
| In a statement regarding the service pack Microsoft admits that
| Vista has "high impact" problems.
`----
http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=37125
|
|
