On Sun, 21 Jan 2007 15:45:44 -0500, Aunty Diluvian wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Jan 2007 10:22:03 +0000, Roy Schestowitz
> <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>__/ [ Mark Kent ] on Sunday 21 January 2007 09:08 \__
>>
>
> <snip>
>
>>
>>In my defense, the OP is a UseNet abuser. The feedback bound to my posts
>>indicates that most readers do welcome my contributions:
>>
>>http://groups-beta.google.com/groups/profile?enc_user=xFvp2hoAAAAb4mOWpyzVaW0aq-bp9NGnjj6y1UsWUZHxqbrtGgkPow
>>
>>4 out of 5, based on 375 ratings.
>>
>>I only mention this in case an outsider blindly accepts the OP's criticism.
>
> This is usenet and while I may personally disagree with your views,
> everyone has the right to post their views, whether they agree or not.
>
> My main disagreement with your postings is that you use this forum
> as a library to seed your google-groups website with the postings
> copied verbatim, in many cases, without the consent of the original
> poster. I'm not sure that this doesn't fall outside of the accepted
> methods and ettiquettes discussed in RFC 1036. (X-No-Archive)
>
> While these are only suggestions and recommendations, they do
> have the effect of differentiating between the ethical and non-ethical
> news servers and website owners.
You've hit the nail on the head.
COLA is nothing more than a forum for Roy Schestowitz to skew common
search terms having to do with Linux vs Microsoft.
That is preciously why he refuses to post all of his bandwidth wasting
noise in one or two journal type posts.
|
|
