__/ [ 7 ] on Sunday 21 January 2007 19:52 \__
> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>
>> Nicholas Petreley's blog - Contradictions in Microsoft's OOXML openness
>>
>> ,----[ Quote ]
>> | Bob Sutor put his finger on the real problem in this article
>> | where he appropriately suggests that Microsoft isn't interested
>> | in interoperability, but is interested in intraoperability, which
>> | is quite different.
>
>
> Well they would have failed on intraoperability too because
> most word docs don't intraoperate with other versions of word
> without crashing / losing data / doing bad job.
> You need openoffice to fix it.
I saw some layour inconsistencies in the past. I believe that's just one
among the many reasons people are starting to export 'liquid' document into
static ones (e.g. PDF's). The only other option is to throw away some money
at a license to use the latest of Microsoft Office _and_ force all others to
do likewise. Peer pressure and incompatibilities make the cash cows fatter.
Customer: If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
Microsoft: If it ain't broke, break it.
>> http://www.linuxjournal.com/node/1000167
--
~~ Best wishes
Roy S. Schestowitz | while (!0==1) echo 'Bill Gates' > /dev/null
http://Schestowitz.com | GNU/Linux | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Swap: 1036184k total, 233624k used, 802560k free, 70724k cached
http://iuron.com - next generation of search paradigms
|
|