On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 06:21:11 +0900, High Plains Thumper wrote:
>> So let me get this straight. You couldn't find anything to bitch at me
>> about in that thread, so you had to take a response from someone else and
>> apply it to mso that you could have something to argue about.
>
> Except that it was you that started that debate.
Of course it was, but that doesn't change the fact that you're dishonestly
trying to attribute Tab's statements to me, and comments made to Tab as
comments to me.
The fact that you couldn't actually find anything that *I* actually said to
argue against shows that you're clutching at straws.
> It was you that took a situation over a personal blog site and turned it
> into a forum issue.
That's all fine and dandy, except that Roy posted his "personal blog" to
COLA in a fit of shameless self-promotion.
> You made the assumption that Mr. Schestowitz violated law regarding
> charitable giving as though it fell under American law instead of
> British, which Mr. Schestowitz is British.
The artists is from the US. The web site Roy stole it from was in the US.
And even under British copyright law, he was still violating it.
> You also made the assumption
> that in his charitable reception Mr. Schestowitz had a major revenue
> generating site at 3 average hits per day.
Donating your ill gained profits to charity doesn't absolve you from
breaking the law.
> The argument you presented was a "mountain out of a molehill.
No, it pointed to the Roy's moral compass, which was clearly off. As is
yours, since you're defending him, and pretending his flagrant violation of
both copyright, and an artists livelihood is no big deal.
You, sir, are a hipocrite.
>> All that does is prove how weak your argument is nymshifter.
>
> Interesting .... Let me get this straight. Individual behind flatfish
> nyms number in the hundreds, linux-sux@xxxxxxxxx has quite a few, Hadron
> nymshifts as Damien O'Leary and Hans Schneider. You said nothing about
> those and now my limited usage is sin? That is a "mountain out of a
> molehill".
I've stated on several occasions I don't agree with Flatfish, and don't
approve of his nymshifting.
Example:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/dd9758b199e84810
>> I fail to understand why you expect me to know the answer to that
>> question. I don't work for Microsoft, nor am I privy to their reasons for
>> (or for not) supporting any given technology. So why are you asking me?
>>
>> Oh, right, you have to make up arguments to prove your superiority.
>
> Superiority? You seem to readily defend every jot and tiddle of
> Microsoft, but you seem unable to provide a response to a simple server
> question? That is a "mountain out of a molehill".
I repeat. Why would you expect me to know?
|
|
