Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] The Evolution of Anti-OLPC FUD (Anti-Humanitarian Causes)

  • Subject: [News] The Evolution of Anti-OLPC FUD (Anti-Humanitarian Causes)
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 05:02:12 +0100
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: Netscape / schestowitz.com
  • User-agent: KNode/0.10.4
Controversy Swirls around OLPC Project

,----[ Quote ]
| However, it now appears that Intel has realized that it's better policy (and 
| better public relations) to work with projects like the OLPC rather than 
| against them. In fact, on July 13 it was announced that Intel is joining the 
| board of the OLPC and will be supporting its efforts to spread low-cost 
| computing to children.    
| 
| With this news, it seemed as if the OLPC had proved its intentions and could 
| finally get on with deploying its XO laptops in developing countries. 
| However, right about the same time, another titan of old-school computing 
| decided to take a few shots at the OLPC and the low-cost XO.   
`----

http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,2161645,00.asp


Related:

The Intel Betrayal (of Linux) 

,----[ Quote ]
| And lastly, I have a word for Intel.  Tsk, Tsk!!  Shame on you!  
| You're more worried about your profits than your customers, or their 
| system security or anything else for that matter.  You're so paranoid 
| about losing customers and market share that you'd rather risk a world 
| wide digital catastrophe (or even a real one depending on where the 
| chips are being used) than to admit your failings.
`----

http://www.raiden.net/?cat=2&aid=264


Intel: Only "Open" for Business

,----[ Quote ]
| These vendors often want a quiet private discussion, because in a
| quiet private discussion they can continue to dismiss the requests and in
| the end do absolutely nothing. They do not want a noisy public
| discussion, because then they look bad. But they DESERVE TO LOOK BAD,
| because they are being bad to those who bought their hardware!
| 
| [...]
| 
| By withholding, Intel is being an Open Source fraud.
| 
| [...]
| 
| So let's win back the rights to run the hardware we purchased.
| 
| Please feel free to let other open source communities know about this
| matter. Thank you. 
`----

http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&sid=20060930232710&mode=expanded


Negroponte says Intel should be "ashamed of itself" 

,----[ Quote ]
| He is furious that Intel's CEO Craig Barrett called the One Laptop a
| gadget. The Negroponte initiative is caught in the middle of a vicious 
| fight between AMD and Intel, he said.
`----

http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=39733


One Laptop Per Child - Production Delays Caused By Microsoft, Intel?

,----[ Quote ]
| I sincerely hope that no matter what the people who are running the
| OLPC project decide, that their project will continue and not get
| bogged down in a play of corporate greed and ambitions.
`----

http://www.lockergnome.com/nexus/blade/2007/04/28/one-laptop-per-child-production-delays-caused-by-microsoft-intel/

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index