Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Open Source Group Spares Novell

Roy Schestowitz wrote:

> __/ [ John Bailo ] on Friday 01 June 2007 03:19 \__
> 
>> 
>> 
>>
>
http://www.redherring.com/Article.aspx?a=22461&hed=Open+Source+Group+Spares+Novell
>> 
>> 
>>> The Free Software Foundation said Thursday its soon-to-be?released
>> open-source software license won?t punish Linux distributor Novell for
>> signing a cooperation pact with Microsoft.
>>>  
>>> The foundation, which has rights to software that makes up the Linux
>> operating system, had raised concerns about the cooperation pact, but
>> said it would allow Novell and Microsoft to develop and distribute
>> software under the new license because that would provide more protection
>> to the open-source community.
>>>  
>>> The group believes that allowing Novell to develop software under the
>>> new
>> general public license, known as GPLv3?and letting Microsoft distribute
>> that software?could extend patent protection to recipients of that
>> software.
>>>  
>>> The foundation made its decision two weeks after Microsoft claimed that
>> Linux and other open-source software violate 235 of its patents (see
>> Microsoft Stokes Linux Fears). Critics decried the claim, saying
>> Microsoft was trying to sow fear, uncertainty and doubt among companies
>> and others that might use versions of Linux other than Novell?s SUSE
>> Linux.
> 
> 
> I have received a reply from an anonymous-yet-reputable source (anonymous
> by preference):
> 
> 'The first story [Finkle] is a lie. There never was a "decision" about
> this. Reuters started it with a bigger lie that a decision would be
> announced. Now this.
> 
> They made it all up.'
> 
> Reuters have done a lot of 'mouthpiece-ing' recently, including the
> anti-FSF headlines. Why am I not surprised?
> 
> http://boycottnovell.com/2007/03/28/media-vs-linux/
> 
> Also see:
> 
>
http://www.itwire.com.au/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=12554&Itemid=1091
> 
> "But if the Reuters report is correct - and Reuters has proved to be
> extremely unreliable on this subject in the past - then the FSF could
> reasonably be accused of a volte-face.
> 
> I've asked Richard Stallman to comment on the report."
> 
> Microsoft sockpuppet at work.
> 
> Other cases where Reuters deceived and showed anti-FSF bias:
> 
> 

Give it up.

Novell took the Gold Ring.

We're going up, baby... UP!



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index