After takin' a swig o' grog, Roy Schestowitz belched out this bit o' wisdom:
> The trolls seem rather confused (still), so here is _another_ new rebuttal and
> clarification (from Windows-oriented sources).
>
> On the face of it, Microsoft continues to seek some form of replacement for the
> insecure O/S that is no longer maintainbale. They have published a new paper:
>
> http://research.microsoft.com/research/pubs/view.aspx?0rc=p&type=Publication&id=1726
Say, I wonder if these Singularity guys were previously working for
Microsoft competitors, and Singularity is the "black hole" into which
Microsoft stuffed them to keep them out of the way.
Whaddaya think?
> Is Windows Vista Really More Secure Than Linux or OS X?
>
> http://www.itjungle.com/two/two062707-story02.html#858200243642724476
...and that is what led Eric Schultze, chief security architect for
security software researcher and developer Shavlik Technologies to
declare that Microsoft was being less than truthful about the nature
of the problem. Despite its apparent risks, MS07-32 was not included
in Jones analysis of Vista vulnerabilities, even though it was issued
before the published date on Jones' report.
> Skeletons in Microsoft?s Patch Day closet
>
> ,----[ Quote ]
> | This is the first time I?ve seen Microsoft prominently admit to silently
> | fixing vulnerabilities in its bulletins ? a controversial practice that
> | effectively reduces the number of publicly documented bug fixes (for those
> | keeping count) and affects patch management/deployment decisions.
> `----
>
> http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=316
Now how can you trust a Microsoft Changelog? Yeesh.
"You're not fooling exploit writers with silent fixes. You're only
fooling your customers," says Marc Maiffret, co-founder of eEye
Digital Security.
That article includes a nice step-by-step comparison of what a cracker
does, versus what an IT does, with a Microsoft patch.
> Beware of undisclosed Microsoft patches
> Microsoft is Counting Bugs Again
> How secure are Linux, Window and Mac OS?
> 2006 Operating System Vulnerability Summary
> Linux vs. Windows: Which is Most Secure?
> Linux Security: A Big Edge Over Windows
> The problems with Vista laid bare - What might have been
> Why Windows is less secure than Linux
> Linux more secure than Windows, national survey shows
> Microsoft Windows: Insecure by Design
> If Only We Knew Then What We Know Now About Windows XP
> Why Windows is a security nightmare.
> The Structural Failures of Windows
> More than half of Microsoft Vista needs re-writing
> Windows Fiji: Now second half of 2008?
> Microsoft admits Vista screwed - report
> Microsoft cuts Windows virtualization features
> A history of Microsoft Windows - the inside story exposed
> MS Insider: The Office Crew Isn't Smart Enough to Supplant Real Windows
> Developers
--
Tux rox!
|
|