Any objections? For Open XML standard, yes (still)
,----[ Quote ]
| But the number of countries with reservations about Open XML in its
| current form remains large enough that the format might not be
| approved by ISO if it were put to a vote Thursday.
`----
http://www.linuxworld.com.au/index.php?id=1043415617&rid=-50
Dirty tricks from Microsoft, intended to sabotage OpenDocument adoption, are
listed below. It's a very partial list and it remains unknown what truly
happens behind the scenes.
Related:
Microsoft and the OOXML ISO standard process
,----[ Quote ]
| Both Computerworld and the Standards Blog report that ECMA answered
| the objections that several ISO members had against fast-tracking the
| ECMA 376 standard.
`----
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=2007030308154032
[Microsoft pays for Wikipedia edits]
http://www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/internet/01/24/microsoft.wikipedia.ap/index.html
When is a standard not a standard?
,----[ Quote ]
| OOXML's method of dealing with the problem in effect locks out
| all applications that are not Microsoft Office, whereas ODF's
| method keeps the standard vendor neutral and usable by any
| office suite
`----
http://www.freesoftwaremagazine.com/node/2110
Microsoft playing three card monte with XML conversion
,----[ Quote ]
| Gary Edwards of the Open Document Foundation, a leading member
| of its technical committee, says Microsoft is playing proprietary
| games aimed at controlling XML file formats and preventing the
| Open Document Format from gaining a foothold.
`----
http://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/?p=959
MA Governor-Elect Names MS Anti-ODF Lobbyist to Technology Advisory Group
,----[ Quote ]
| That person is Brian Burke, the Microsoft Regional Director for Public
| Affairs, and if that surprises you, it surprises me as well, given the
| degree of acrimonious debate and disinformation witnessed in Massachusetts
| over the last 15 months involving the Information Technology Division's
| transition to ODF.... it is my understanding that it was Burke who led
| the lobbying effort on Beacon Hill against ODF, and also urged legislators
| to introduce the amendment intended to take away much of the ITD's
| planning power generally, and as regards standards specifically, and hand
| it to a task force made up of political appointees.... Although I'm told
| that Burke announced yesterday at the first meeting of the new working
| group that he will be participating as a private citizen rather than a
| Microsoft employee, I believe that Burke should recuse himself from
| participating in any discussions or recommendations relating to
| document format standards.
`----
http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=20061128161343183
,----[ Quote ]
| Quinn: Almost to a person, to anybody involved or who knows about
| the ODF issue, they attributed the story to Microsoft, right, wrong
| or otherwise. Senator Pacheco may be a bully but I do not believe he
| is disingenious and would stoop to such a tactic. Senator Pacheco and
| Secretary Galvin's office remain very heavily influenced by the
| Microsoft money and its lobbyist machine, as witnessed by their
| playbook and words, in my opinion.
|
| Quinn: I believe that the ODF decision will stand. I believe MS
| will continue to do anything and everything it can to stop it. And I
| know my seat wasn't even empty and they (MS) took another shot at
| the title, to no avail. This horse is out of the barn and I see no
| way for it to go back in. Remember, all we are asking for was and is
| for Microsoft to commit to open and the standards process; so
| everyone looks really bad if the plug gets pulled at this juncture.
`----
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20060119232859729
[ECMA:] A Coin-in-the-Slot Standards Organization
http://boycottnovell.com/2006/12/12/a-coin-in-the-slot-standards-organization/
|
|
