On Sun, 04 Mar 2007 03:19:46 +0000, Roy Schestowitz
<newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>__/ [ B Gruff ] on Saturday 03 March 2007 23:25 \__
>
>> On Saturday 03 March 2007 23:07 William Poaster wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 03 Mar 2007 16:57:32 -0600, AB wrote:
>>>
>>>> I get COLA messages, starting with 199. At the end of killfiling I
>>>> *still* have 135 left. Fantastic!
>>>>
>>>> A sure sign that the trolls have surrendered, at least for the time
>>>> being. No doubt, though, that they're preparing for another full frontal
>>>> assault in the near term.
>>>
>>> Maybe they were recalled to Redmond for a reboot!
>>
>> They are certainly in need of a SP or two.
>> One poor sod here is still working with his old "Linux fonts" brief!
>> Wouldn't you think they'd keep their people a tad better educated?
>
>I suspect that the more we expose activities such as OS/2 Munchkins,
>shilling, paid-for Wikipedia edits and the like, the less we'll see the
>trolls. Microsoft is in hot water. It doesn't want to get it boiling. Like
>open source, it's /transparency/ that's doing them a lot of damage. Just
>look at Doug's posts, which make a good record of all the stuff Microsoft
>tried to hide with a large-scale settlement.
The only thing you'll expose is your wee-willy underneath
your raincoat. The "trolls", as you call them, are not here
to disrupt or spread FUD but to educate and enlighten.
They are here to stay as long as the likes of you spread
lies regarding the shortcomings of Windows and/or the
advantages of Linux.
In other words, as long as you Linuxers tell lies, we'll be
here to tell the truth. Is that good news?
|
|
