-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 21:31:45 -0700,
Tim Smith <reply_in_group@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In article <231sc4-dt5.ln1@xxxxxxxxxx>, "[H]omer" <spam@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> The last barrier to full 64bit browsing now is Sun, who rather
>> idiotically produce a 64bit version of everything *but* one tiny little
>> plugin required by browsers. Idiots. Of course there's always Blackdown
>> Java, which I seem to recall trying (and it *did* work).
>
> Why do you care? What would a 64-bit version actually *do* for you that
> the 32-bit version does not do?
>
Allow him to remove a scad of 32 bit libraries only needed for the few
bits of sw that haven't been compiled for the 64 bit system he uses?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFF+4PHd90bcYOAWPYRAtraAKCCW3kpPa2H5THQcbgDujepd9k6aACgn6rY
fLbp4orJ9wPhYY+vUgPXXwo=
=rsQp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Jim Richardson http://www.eskimo.com/~warlock
The United States of America: Screwing with the
English Language for over 200 years.
--Mike Sphar
|
|
