William Poaster wrote:
>On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 08:49:46 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>
>>> And naturally never even comments about the behaviour of that swine
>>> flatfish, as flatfish is one of his buddies. Nice one
>
>Of course not! You expect Quack to condemn the behaviour of another
>wintroll? Just another proof that Quack is *not* a linux advocate.
He's a POS. Just like his buddies flatshit, dfs, etc.
|
|
