On Mar 11, 5:14 pm, achmed.jo...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On Mar 11, 4:50 pm, Roy Schestowitz <newsgro...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > __/ [ achmed.jo...@xxxxxxxxx ] on Sunday 11 March 2007 21:41 \__
>
> > > On Mar 11, 3:50 pm, Hadron Quark <hadronqu...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >> Peter Köhlmann <peter.koehlm...@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > >> >http://news.ncsu.edu/releases/2007/march/041.html
>
> > >> > According to our resident dimwits and the superspecialist and "true
> > >> > linux advocate" and "kernel hacker" Hadron Quark this would never happen
>
> > >> I'm pretty sure I never said that would never happen you bare faced
> > >> liar.
>
> > >> What I said is that the PS3 wont replace the PC in the household as
> > >> claimed by your buddy and eternal bore Mark "I have children" Kent.
>
> > > Yikes!!
> > > Is Mark Kent capable of breeding?
> > > There is nobody who is more of a bore than Mark Kent.
> > > He could put an army of ants at a picnic to sleep.
> > > I'll bet his kids hate him.
>
> > > This group in and of itself is a total bore.
>
> > > Most threads go like this:
>
> > > Roy Schestowitz re-posts someone elses message which he has borrowed
> > > from a blog.
> > > Mark Kent comes along and says "what a great idea Roy, I was just
> > > thinking of that idea today".
> > > B Gruff comes along and says how great Mark and Roy are for posting
> > > such great material.
> > > A troll posts within the thread, more than likely because he is bored.
> > > Peter Kohlman calls the person a flatfish.
> > > William Poaster comes along and explains how he doesn't see any of the
> > > troll messages by virtue of his
> > > fantastic filter system. He never fails to respond 3rd party though
> > > with some snoozer of a comment.
> > > 7 comes along and acts like a 7 year old making the Linux advocates
> > > look even more stupid than they normally look.
>
> > > And then we move on to another thread and the process begins again.
>
> > > Yawwn.
>
> > > Linux advocacy is a dying art from. At least in comp.os.linux advocacy
> > > anyway.
>
> > Now it's obvious. achmed.jo...@xxxxxxxxx is Gary 'flatfish' Stewart.
>
> > *plonk*
>
> > --
> > ~~ Best wishes
>
> > Roy S. Schestowitz | Holey (sic) Cow! Longhorn is full of holes...http://Schestowitz.com| GNU is Not UNIX | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
> > roy pts/3 Sun Mar 11 21:33 still logged in
> > http://iuron.com-proposing a non-profit search engine- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> A nerve has been struck!
> Notice the total, utter lack of proof of that statement.
>
> Also notice the run and hide tactic which is so typical of the Linux
> zealots.
> He can't prove I am flatfish, I am not though.
> He also can't prove that flatfish is Gary Stewart because if he could,
> he would be spouting the proof all over
> the place and would be a hero in comp.os.linux.advocacy instead of
> just a novelty and a spammer.
>
> For those that don't know, this is the way Linux advocates/zealots
> operate.
> They will lie, tell you anything they can conjure up just to entice
> you into using Linux no matter how poor Linux may be for your
> particular situation and when the entire affair implodes on you, you
> lose your job, waste your time and so forth then they will call you
> names and attempt to put the blame on you for your Linux failure.
>
> This is Linux advocacy in a nutshell.
> And this is why you would be crazy to bet your business on Linux.
> These are the same people that you will be looking to for help, unless
> you buy an overpriced Linux support contract.
>
> The problem is that this ragtag bunch of oddball, antisocial geeks
> can't see anything other than Linux and will try and shoehorn Linux
> into all situations.
>
> The tax program thread is a classic.
>
> Notice how the points against that POS Linux program are never
> addressed but yet the person bgringing up said points is villified.
> Welcome to Linux and the Linux community.
>
> I'd rather use OS/2 than be stuck with Linux.
> At least the OS/2 community is friendly and not a bunch of liars.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
I personally believe the Open Source Desktop can eventually surpass
Microsoft's commercial offering, but it hasn't happened yet, and the
"linux advocates" represented on this group are the ones slowin down
the process by browbeating anyone with a constructive suggestion.
|
|
