In comp.os.linux.advocacy Reporter <TruckSafety@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mar 11, 5:14 pm, achmed.jo...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> On Mar 11, 4:50 pm, Roy Schestowitz <newsgro...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > __/ [ achmed.jo...@xxxxxxxxx ] on Sunday 11 March 2007 21:41 \__
>>
>> > > On Mar 11, 3:50 pm, Hadron Quark <hadronqu...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > >> Peter K?hlmann <peter.koehlm...@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> > >> >http://news.ncsu.edu/releases/2007/march/041.html
>>
>> > >> > According to our resident dimwits and the superspecialist and "true
>> > >> > linux advocate" and "kernel hacker" Hadron Quark this would never happen
>>
>> > >> I'm pretty sure I never said that would never happen you bare faced
>> > >> liar.
>>
>> > >> What I said is that the PS3 wont replace the PC in the household as
>> > >> claimed by your buddy and eternal bore Mark "I have children" Kent.
>>
>> > > Yikes!!
>> > > Is Mark Kent capable of breeding?
>> > > There is nobody who is more of a bore than Mark Kent.
>> > > He could put an army of ants at a picnic to sleep.
>> > > I'll bet his kids hate him.
>>
>> > > This group in and of itself is a total bore.
>>
>> > > Most threads go like this:
>>
>> > > Roy Schestowitz re-posts someone elses message which he has borrowed
>> > > from a blog.
>> > > Mark Kent comes along and says "what a great idea Roy, I was just
>> > > thinking of that idea today".
>> > > B Gruff comes along and says how great Mark and Roy are for posting
>> > > such great material.
>> > > A troll posts within the thread, more than likely because he is bored.
>> > > Peter Kohlman calls the person a flatfish.
>> > > William Poaster comes along and explains how he doesn't see any of the
>> > > troll messages by virtue of his
>> > > fantastic filter system. He never fails to respond 3rd party though
>> > > with some snoozer of a comment.
>> > > 7 comes along and acts like a 7 year old making the Linux advocates
>> > > look even more stupid than they normally look.
>>
>> > > And then we move on to another thread and the process begins again.
>>
>> > > Yawwn.
>>
>> > > Linux advocacy is a dying art from. At least in comp.os.linux advocacy
>> > > anyway.
>>
>> > Now it's obvious. achmed.jo...@xxxxxxxxx is Gary 'flatfish' Stewart.
>>
>> > *plonk*
>>
>> > --
>> > ~~ Best wishes
>>
>> > Roy S. Schestowitz | Holey (sic) Cow! Longhorn is full of holes...http://Schestowitz.com| GNU is Not UNIX | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
>> > roy pts/3 Sun Mar 11 21:33 still logged in
>> > http://iuron.com-proposing a non-profit search engine- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> > - Show quoted text -
>>
>> A nerve has been struck!
>> Notice the total, utter lack of proof of that statement.
>>
>> Also notice the run and hide tactic which is so typical of the Linux
>> zealots.
>> He can't prove I am flatfish, I am not though.
>> He also can't prove that flatfish is Gary Stewart because if he could,
>> he would be spouting the proof all over
>> the place and would be a hero in comp.os.linux.advocacy instead of
>> just a novelty and a spammer.
>>
>> For those that don't know, this is the way Linux advocates/zealots
>> operate.
>> They will lie, tell you anything they can conjure up just to entice
>> you into using Linux no matter how poor Linux may be for your
>> particular situation and when the entire affair implodes on you, you
>> lose your job, waste your time and so forth then they will call you
>> names and attempt to put the blame on you for your Linux failure.
>>
>> This is Linux advocacy in a nutshell.
>> And this is why you would be crazy to bet your business on Linux.
>> These are the same people that you will be looking to for help, unless
>> you buy an overpriced Linux support contract.
>>
>> The problem is that this ragtag bunch of oddball, antisocial geeks
>> can't see anything other than Linux and will try and shoehorn Linux
>> into all situations.
>>
>> The tax program thread is a classic.
>>
>> Notice how the points against that POS Linux program are never
>> addressed but yet the person bgringing up said points is villified.
>> Welcome to Linux and the Linux community.
>>
>> I'd rather use OS/2 than be stuck with Linux.
>> At least the OS/2 community is friendly and not a bunch of liars.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> I personally believe the Open Source Desktop can eventually surpass
> Microsoft's commercial offering, but it hasn't happened yet, and the
> "linux advocates" represented on this group are the ones slowin down
> the process by browbeating anyone with a constructive suggestion.
>
Yes, thats right, a little inane newsgroup on usenet (a portion of
the internet almost completely unknown by the vast majority of its
denizens) controls the future of open source.
You fucking idiot.
-----yttrx
--
http://www.yttrx.net
|
|
