On Tue, 15 May 2007 10:48:22 +0100, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
> __/ [ William Poaster ] on Tuesday 15 May 2007 09:47 \__
>
>> On Tue, 15 May 2007 08:15:04 +0200, Peter KÃhlmann wrote:
>>
>>> Erik Funkenbusch wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 14 May 2007 20:50:54 -0700, Jim Richardson wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> It's time for MS to put up or shut up. Show the patents they claim
>>>>> Linux infringes, and then either the coders can fix it, or the legal
>>>>> beagles can challange the patent in court.
>>>>>
>>>>> Absent MS providing concrete info of this nature, it is FUD, pure
>>>>> and simple.
>>>>
>>>> That depends entirely on whether or not their claims are valid.
>>>> Failure to support a claim doesn't mean the claim isn't valid.
>>
>> Oh, I wonder if *this* is why "Ewik the Weasel" believes his spurious
>> "claims" don't need to be supported?
>> You know the ones:
>> Why can't M$ TTFonts be used in linux.
>>
>> How did the Morris worm spread by email?
>>
>> What about the "thousands of root exploits per month" he claimed, (&
>> was then found to be making it all up)?
>>
>>
>> What was the plan he was going to reveal wrt adding nonsensical lines
>> to the ends of Roy's posts? You know, the plan he was going to tell us
>> about before he spent a week away and fell behind? Right? The time he
>> fell behind by a week and had to take 3 or more months to get caught up
>> with posts?
>> Just what *was* that plan he claimed he was going to amaze us with?
>>
>>
>>>> You should know that.
>>>
>>> Yes, we know. SCO has shown us that.
>>> And they had "millions of lines of stolen code" to withhold from us
>>
>> IMO if someone makes claims, they *should* be prepared to back it up
>> with solid proof, & *not* strawman arguments....like Ewik the Weasel.
>
> Add this one where he ran away from the argument despite the fact that I
> explicitly asked for an answer (at least twice). This was visible to me
> because he modified the subject line to mock and stick labels.
>
> ===
>
> Message-ID: <2635483.2e5CEGKtRL@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> From: Roy Schestowitz
> <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
> Subject:
> Re: [Roy Schestowitz Lies Again] Windows Gets Another 'Hack' to Fix
> Inherently-insecure System (was: [News] Windows Gets Another 'Hack' to
> Fix Inherently-insecure System)
> Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 15:45:29 +0100 References:
> <5873372.Td0drfXh8W@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> <1mvmxs8e2ac13$.dlg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> <1634949.4TdDgiFVp8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> X-OpenPGP: id=74572E8E; url=http://schestowitz.com/PGP Xref:
> ellandroad.demon.co.uk comp.os.linux.advocacy:518604 References: 1 2 3
__/ [ Roy Schestowitz ] on Saturday 28 April 2007 11:50 \__
<snip>
======
Done! :-)
|
|
