On Sat, 10 Nov 2007 22:49:51 +0000, Mark Kent wrote:
> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>> ____/ Kier on Saturday 10 November 2007 12:23 : \____
>>
>>> On Sat, 10 Nov 2007 09:50:53 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>
>>>> ____/ Erik Funkenbusch on Saturday 10 November 2007 09:08 : \____
>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, 10 Nov 2007 03:41:37 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> NY Rejects E-Voting, DOJ Trying to Force The Issue
>>>
>>> <snip>
>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/11/09/1831248&from=rss
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Watch how Microsoft tried to block NYC from using open source voting
>>>>>> systems (link at the bottom).
>>>>>
>>>>> Stop lying Roy. Stop it. You're not doing yourself, or Linux advocacy
>>>>> any good. You think by seperating your claim and putting a link
>>>>> further down that people won't bother to actually read it, so you can
>>>>> lie your ass off.
>>>>
>>>> What on earth? First of all, stop modifying subject lines to get past
>>>> filters. Seconly, /nowhere/ did I suggest that the story above was about
>>>> Microsoft. It even says "link at the bottom". I show that the DoJ is
>>>> totally out of control, I say that Microsoft has been caught doing dirty
>>>> tricks in NY, and I also state that the DoJ is in bed with Microsoft
>>>> (which it is). It's a matter os exposing yet more funny business in the
>>>> Establishment, of which Microsoft is frequently a part (it is!).
>>>
>>> Except you aren't exposing it, are you? You're making assumptions.
>>
>> Kier, watch the OP's references at the bootm.
>>
>>>> <snip wishful thinking />
>>>
>>> Come off it, Roy. You said: "Watch how Microsoft tried to block NYC
>>> from using open source voting systems." How can that not be about MS, and
>>> how can it be true when it's been pointed out to be incorrect?
>>>
>>> If you're inaccurate or just plain wrong, you aren't doing Linux advocacy
>>> any good. Be more careful about checking what you post - I've said this
>>> before. A dozen well-researched and accurate articles are worth far more
>>> than a hundred poorly researched, inaccurate or misleading articles.
>>>
>>> Quality before quantity.
>>
>> You know, Kier, [H]omer's assigned label in your name begins to make more
>> sense. Do you /really/ think that Microsoft does not game the government. Dare
>> I say, are you out of your mind? It's so obvious and everyone who looks at
>> that stuff knows it. Some are just too afraid to comment on this.
>>
>> Governments are corrupt. Cope with it. The least one can do is identity /where/
>> they are corrupt because otherwise things won't change.
>>
>
> Roy,
>
> Kier is a very very clever microsoft shill. He plays a beautiful game,
Liar. I am not a Microsoft shill, or any other kind of shill.
> pretending to be a linux user of low intelligence, engaging in all kinds
> of often quite abusive interactions with the more overt anti-linux,
Again, you are a liar. I don't pretend to be anything. I am a Linux user.
I'm certainly not of low intelligence, or pretending to be such.
> anti-charter, anti-faq people here, but, if you look very carefully, he
> saves his nastiest vitriol for the on-topic, pro-charter crowd,
> *always*.
Liar. What I hate is liars.
>
> You'll note how he is trying anything he can to persuade you to reduce
> the rate at which you're posting factual articles... now, why would that
> be?
Liar. I want him to be MORE accurate, not less.
>
> You'll note how, whenever evidence is presented which shows the points
> to be correct, him to be wrong; he *never* responds.
Bollocks. Utter bollocks. And you know it.
>
> He's a super-Erik. Please, killfile him.
Fuck you, too, Mark.
--
Kier
|
|
