Mark Kent wrote:
> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>> ____/ Kier on Saturday 10 November 2007 12:23 : \____
>>
>>> On Sat, 10 Nov 2007 09:50:53 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>
>>>> ____/ Erik Funkenbusch on Saturday 10 November 2007 09:08 : \____
>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, 10 Nov 2007 03:41:37 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> NY Rejects E-Voting, DOJ Trying to Force The Issue
>>>
>>> <snip>
>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/11/09/1831248&from=rss
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Watch how Microsoft tried to block NYC from using open source voting
>>>>>> systems (link at the bottom).
>>>>>
>>>>> Stop lying Roy. Stop it. You're not doing yourself, or Linux
>>>>> advocacy
>>>>> any good. You think by seperating your claim and putting a link
>>>>> further down that people won't bother to actually read it, so you can
>>>>> lie your ass off.
>>>>
>>>> What on earth? First of all, stop modifying subject lines to get past
>>>> filters. Seconly, /nowhere/ did I suggest that the story above was
>>>> about Microsoft. It even says "link at the bottom". I show that the DoJ
>>>> is totally out of control, I say that Microsoft has been caught doing
>>>> dirty tricks in NY, and I also state that the DoJ is in bed with
>>>> Microsoft (which it is). It's a matter os exposing yet more funny
>>>> business in the Establishment, of which Microsoft is frequently a part
>>>> (it is!).
>>>
>>> Except you aren't exposing it, are you? You're making assumptions.
>>
>> Kier, watch the OP's references at the bootm.
>>
>>>> <snip wishful thinking />
>>>
>>> Come off it, Roy. You said: "Watch how Microsoft tried to block NYC
>>> from using open source voting systems." How can that not be about MS,
>>> and how can it be true when it's been pointed out to be incorrect?
>>>
>>> If you're inaccurate or just plain wrong, you aren't doing Linux
>>> advocacy any good. Be more careful about checking what you post - I've
>>> said this before. A dozen well-researched and accurate articles are
>>> worth far more than a hundred poorly researched, inaccurate or
>>> misleading articles.
>>>
>>> Quality before quantity.
>>
>> You know, Kier, [H]omer's assigned label in your name begins to make more
>> sense. Do you /really/ think that Microsoft does not game the government.
>> Dare I say, are you out of your mind? It's so obvious and everyone who
>> looks at that stuff knows it. Some are just too afraid to comment on
>> this.
>>
>> Governments are corrupt. Cope with it. The least one can do is identity
>> /where/ they are corrupt because otherwise things won't change.
>>
>
> Roy,
>
> Kier is a very very clever microsoft shill.
Well, you are a very stupid liar
He might engage trolls too much (but so do I), but thats it
Claiming that he *misrepresents* Roys posts is dishonest of Snot proportions
< snip more Mark K idiocy >
--
If you had any brains, you'd be dangerous.
|
|
