Re: How is lying "advocating Linux" Roy?
Tim Smith wrote:
High Plains Thumper wrote:
Tim Smith wrote:
How were your lies about Rod Trent's Digg submissions
advocating Linux, Roy?
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/871d2cfb7d29f1a0?dmode=source
or http://tinyurl.com/26vc2k
[quote]
Tim Smith wrote:
Or this one, for just his technology submissions:
<http://digg.com/users/rodtrent/news/submitted/view/technology>
You've said you believe Roy, even though you admit you
haven't checked. Why not spend a couple minutes and find
out for yourself?
Reference the official FAQ found at
at http://www.faqs.org/faqs/linux/advocacy/faq-and-primer/
1.4 The Charter of comp.os.linux.advocacy
The charter of comp.os.linux.advocacy is:
For discussion of the benefits of Linux compared to
other operating systems.
<SNIP>
Recommend posting according to the charter. Concerns of a
poster's external activity beyond c.o.l.advocacy are not
"discussion of the benefits of Linux compared to other
operating operating systems", does not interest the Linux
advocates and is best left for other forums.
[/quote]
How is lying about Rod Trent's Digg submissions a discussion
of the benefits of Linux compared to other operating systems?
Do you think that Rod Trent is an operating system?
<Yawn ......>
http://www.faqs.org/faqs/linux/advocacy/faq-and-primer/
7.6 Trespasser Disinformation Tactics
[quote]
17. Don't substantiate your claims. Refuse to present evidence
to support your invalid claims. Repeat your invalid claims and
have your anti-Linux propagandist comrades do the same. Do the
same for any invalid claims that you have notice your anti-Linux
propagandists comrades make.
[/quote]
--
HPT
|
|
|